Back to Know Your Rights

Contracts Guide

360 deals explained for musicians

A 360 deal is a music business agreement where one company takes a share of income from more than one part of your career. It may include recordings, publishing, live, merchandise, brand deals, content, name and likeness, fan subscriptions or future revenue streams. This guide explains how to read the structure before you sign.

Last reviewed18 May 2026
Reviewed byMusicians Rights UK editorial team
Editorial standardSource-led education

What this means in practice

A traditional record deal usually focuses on recorded music. A 360 deal reaches beyond that. The company may say it is investing in the whole artist, so it wants a share of the whole artist business. That does not automatically make a 360 deal bad. A company that funds recording, marketing, tour support, content, radio, playlisting, brand partnerships and admin may ask for broader participation because it is taking broader risk. The danger is when the deal is broad but the service is vague. If a company takes a percentage of all career income but only provides limited management, access to a small studio, basic distribution or introductions, the artist may be giving up too much control for too little guaranteed value. The most important distinction is active value versus passive participation. Active value means the company is actually doing specific work in that income stream. Passive participation means it takes money from streams it did not create, fund, negotiate or administer.

What this guide covers

What a 360 deal is
Which income streams can be included
How 360 deals differ from management, label and publishing deals
Why exclusivity matters
How recoupment and cross-collateralisation can change the economics
Approval rights and signing authority
Conflict risks when the manager, label and publisher are connected
Questions to ask before signing

What income can a 360 deal touch?

A broad 360 deal may ask for a percentage of: - master recording income - publishing or songwriting income - live performance and touring income - merchandise - brand deals, sponsorship and endorsements - sync and media fees - social media, content and creator income - neighbouring rights or performer income - direct-to-fan membership or subscription income - name, image, likeness and digital avatar income - income from future formats or technologies The key question is not only "what percentage?" It is "percentage of what, for how long, in which territory, after what deductions, and in exchange for what work?"

Exclusivity versus non-exclusivity

Exclusivity means you agree to work only with that company, or only through that company, for the covered services, rights, territory or term. Exclusive management can mean one manager controls management services for all artist activities. Exclusive recording can mean you cannot record for another label during the term. Exclusive publishing can mean works written during the term are controlled by one publisher. Non-exclusive means you keep the ability to work with others, subject to the specific wording. A non-exclusive distributor, for example, may take a share only from releases you deliver to that distributor. Exclusivity matters because it can block your next move. If one party controls recordings, management, brand deals and approvals, you may not be able to accept better opportunities without their consent. That is why exclusivity should be tied to clear services, clear performance obligations and a sensible exit route.

The management plus label plus subsidiary pattern

A high-risk structure can look like this: 1. A company signs the artist for management services and takes 20% of all career earnings. 2. The management appointment is exclusive, worldwide and covers all entertainment activities. 3. The same company, or a related company, also owns a record label, publisher, distributor or services subsidiary. 4. The contract gives the company authority to sign documents or approve deals for the artist. 5. The artist is then signed into a label deal controlled by the same group, sometimes on terms such as 80/20 in the label's favour. The issue is not only the percentage. The issue is conflict of interest. A manager is supposed to help the artist judge whether a label deal is good. If the manager also owns or benefits from the label deal, the artist needs independent advice, written conflict disclosure and approval rights before anything is signed.

Power of attorney and signing authority

Power of attorney means giving someone authority to act on your behalf within the powers granted. In a music deal, any clause allowing someone to sign agreements, grant rights, approve uses or collect income for you should be treated as high risk. Questions to ask: - What exact documents can they sign? - Can they sign me to their own label, publisher, distributor or subsidiary? - Do they need my written approval first? - Is the authority limited to admin, or can it transfer rights? - Can I revoke it? - Does it survive the contract ending? - Does my lawyer approve the wording? For many artists, a safer structure is limited administrative authority only, with written approval required for any deal that transfers rights, creates exclusivity, grants likeness rights, borrows money, incurs major costs or changes ownership.

Recoupment and cross-collateralisation

A 360 deal can become much harsher if costs from one area are recouped from another. Example: the company spends money on recording and marketing. Your live income, publishing income or merchandise income is then used to recoup those costs before you receive money. That may be called cross-collateralisation. This is where "20%" or "80/20" can mislead you. The practical result depends on the definition of gross income, net income, recoupable costs, deductions, accounting periods, audit rights and whether one income stream can be used to cover losses in another. Ask for a worked example in pounds before signing. If the other side cannot explain when you get paid, what is recouped, and what happens if one stream loses money, the deal is not clear enough.

What a fairer 360 structure might include

Artist-protective terms may include: - lower percentages for income streams the company does not actively work on - caps on commission from live, merchandise, brand and publishing income - no commission on income earned before the deal - no commission on gifts, damages, grants, hardship funds or unrelated employment - no assignment of copyright unless there is a strong reason - clear approval rights for sync, brand deals, AI, likeness and major spend - written conflict disclosure for related companies - independent legal advice before signature - a short initial term with objective performance milestones - a sunset clause reducing post-term commission over time - audit rights and regular accounting - reversion or release obligations if music is not released

360 Deal Review Checklist

  • Identify every income stream covered by the deal
  • Check whether the percentage is calculated on gross, net or receipts after deductions
  • Ask what specific services the company must provide for each income stream
  • Separate management, label, publishing, distribution and brand rights where possible
  • Check whether the company can sign documents or approve deals on your behalf
  • Look for conflicts involving owned labels, publishers, distributors or subsidiaries
  • Check whether costs from one stream can recoup from another stream
  • Ask for release commitments, marketing commitments and minimum service obligations
  • Review term, territory, options, renewal rights and termination routes
  • Check audit rights, statement frequency and payment timing
  • Ask for carve-outs for existing income, side projects and unrelated work
  • Get independent music legal advice before signing

This checklist is for general education only and is not legal, tax or financial advice.

Common mistakes to avoid

Thinking a 360 deal is just a record deal with a slightly wider royalty rate
Ignoring income streams that are not making money yet but may matter later
Letting one company control management, label, publishing and approval decisions without conflict protections
Accepting a broad percentage of all earnings without clear service obligations
Missing power of attorney or signing authority language
Not asking whether costs can be cross-collateralised across income streams
Focusing only on the advance instead of the long-term control position
Assuming verbal promises about promotion, budgets or introductions will be enforceable

Example scenarios

Management-only deal with a broad commission

A manager asks for 20% of all entertainment income, worldwide, exclusively. That may be common as a headline, but the artist should check term, post-term commission, expenses, side-project carve-outs, what income is excluded and how the manager is removed if the relationship stops working.

360 label deal with active investment

A label funds recordings, videos, marketing, radio, tour support and merchandise production. It asks for a smaller participation in non-recording income while it is actively funding those areas. The artist negotiates caps, audit rights and release commitments.

Manager-owned label conflict

A management company wants exclusive management and then asks the artist to sign an 80/20 label deal with a label it owns. The artist should treat this as a conflict issue, require independent legal advice, written approval and clear evidence that the label terms are competitive.

Power of attorney hidden in admin wording

A contract says the company may execute documents and grant rights on the artist's behalf. The artist asks for the clause to be narrowed to routine administration only, with written approval required for any deal, transfer, exclusivity, borrowing, AI, likeness or copyright permission.

These scenarios are illustrative examples only and not legal advice. Your situation may differ.

Records to keep

Full signed contract, schedules and side letters
Company structure and related-company disclosures
All drafts showing changes to rights, commission and approval clauses
Budget, marketing, release and service commitments
Royalty and commission statements
Expense receipts and recoupment records
Written approvals for any related-company deal
Legal advice notes and conflict disclosures

When to speak to a qualified professional

A company wants a percentage of all career earnings
One company or group controls management, label, publishing or distribution
The contract includes power of attorney, signing authority or irrevocable appointment language
The deal includes long exclusivity, worldwide rights or multiple option periods
You are being offered an advance that recoups across multiple income streams
You do not understand whether rights are assigned, licensed or administered
You are pressured to sign before a lawyer has reviewed the full contract

360 Deal Clause Review Sheet

A practical worksheet for mapping income streams, approvals, commission, recoupment and conflicts before signing.

Free membership unlocks practical checklists, templates, partner updates, directory alerts and selected tools.

Educational Disclaimer: This guide is for general educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax or financial advice. The information provided is based on publicly available resources and may not reflect the most current legal developments. Always consult with qualified professionals for advice specific to your situation. Musicians Rights UK is not a trade union, collecting society, law firm, royalty collection society, publishing administrator or government body.

Quick answers

Is a 360 deal always bad for artists?

No. A 360 deal can make sense if the company provides real investment and services across the income streams it shares in. The risk is a broad deal where the company takes income from areas it does not actively build.

What does exclusivity mean in a music deal?

Exclusivity usually means you cannot work with another company for the covered rights, services, territory or term. It matters because it can stop you accepting other opportunities without consent.

Should a manager have power of attorney for an artist?

Any power to sign or grant rights for an artist is high risk and should be reviewed by an independent music lawyer. If authority is needed, it should be narrow, clear, revocable where possible and subject to written approval for major decisions.

Get more practical guidance

Join the Musicians Rights UK newsletter for free updates on contracts, royalties and fair pay.

No spam, ever. Unsubscribe with one click.

Want early access to more resources?

Membership gives access to educational resources, newsletters, partner offers, directory updates and selected tools.